WW Chapter 18: Colonial Encounters in Asia, Africa and Oceania
Britania, the Warrior Queen, ruling over the world
(Source: http://www.melaskole.no/the-story-of-an-empire.html)
Chapter 18: Colonial Encounters in Asia, Africa and Oceania
This chapter, probably more than any other, ticked me off. Since I am a business major, I understand the importance of a free market and how trade can make us all better off. The colonies of the world powers durring this period certainly fueled the economic engines of modern empires, but the externalities generated by the activities led to local market failures that were never addressed. Most egregious was the fact that the colonizing power replaced the production of goods and services by a country with the production of resources they wished to exploit or sell abroad. And they did it with coerced local labor from the colony. Not only does this ignore the free market position of what should be a soveriegn nation, but it destroys their ability to be self sufficient. Often times, surplus was produced despite the market value of the export. This is not good for long term strategy, nor is it ethical.
In fact, (I don't think this is in the book, but it bears mentioning) France replaced North Africa's local grains with peanuts since the extraction technology made peanut oil valuable, and replaced it in the local diet with broken rice from French colonies in Vietnam (called middlin's in the south). They effectively created a new market for goods to sell BACK to their own colonies. African national dishes changed from being based on teff, fonio and millet -- Their traditional grains -- to being based on broken rice. North African agriculture is still based that way today, using imported grains and exporting peanuts. A culture was destroyed in the span of less than a century. The Russians did the same thing with their centrally planned economy -- putting production in countries where they thought it should go replacing what was there before, destroying local economies and wiping out cultures. These colonies became completely dependent upon their rulers, making it almost impossible to break free and gain independence.
When France, Britain and Belgium was through exploiting all the resources they could, they pulled out of Africa in the 60's. They offered them pure independence or self governance with economic ties back to the empires. Naturally, most countries selected the later, and decades of failed administrations due to a post colonial power vacuum followed. Only now is Africa regaining its identity.
I just found the sheer ignorance of the world powers arrogant and clueless as to what is really important and how to build sustaining trade and encourage a free market. Where once a flourishing market between Asia and Africa existed, complete with trade routes and cross cultural exchanges, Europe changed the entire landscape like locusts, devouring everything in their path.
Western educational systems taught the colonies that European thought was superior. Over generations, cultural knowledge and identities were erased and forgotten or worse yet, disdained by the people that shared them in favor of a more modern and European view.
Comments
Post a Comment